GW&K investment experts share their late-2024 review and outlook for municipal bonds.
Read ArticleGW&K's Taxable Bond Team shares how October 2024 fixed income market events are influencing their portfolio positioning, sector allocation, and outlook.
Read ArticleMidway through the third quarter, the soft-landing scenario was briefly upended by an unexpected weakening in the labor market that sparked fears around growth and a potential policy mistake.
Read ArticleWe use cookies to improve your experience on our website. To accept cookies click Accept & Close, or continue browsing as normal. For more information or to learn how to opt out of cookies, please see our cookie policy.
Accept and CloseGW&K's CIO and Portfolio Managers share their insights and opinions on the economy and market each quarter.
Firm-wide
US productivity is surging — potentially adding $7 trillion to GDP by 2034. Bill Sterling covers the drivers and potential obstacles in this article.
Read ArticleMunicipal Bond
Results of upcoming US elections will likely affect municipal bonds, tax laws, and borrowing trends. Stay informed with GW&K’s latest muni research.
Read Article
Market Dynamics Impacting Mortgage-Backed Securities
MORTGAGE-BACKED SECURITIES | NOVEMBER 2024
In this interview, GW&K’s Senior Securitized Analyst/Government Bond Portfolio Manager, Brendan Doucette, shares his analysis of the recent trends and dynamics in the mortgage- backed securities (MBS) sector. These include some of the reasons behind wider spreads in this sector, the impact of rate volatility, and the shift in the buyer base from the Federal Reserve and banks to money managers.
He also explores the outlook and potential for outperformance in the MBS sector, which accounts for a large portion of the market — over 25% of the Bloomberg US Aggregate Index — and highlights factors that could drive spreads back to longer-term averages.
Q: Why have spreads in the MBS sector remained wide relative to other sectors over the past couple of years?
Brendan: MBS spreads moved substantially wider in 2022 when the US Federal Reserve (Fed) began tightening monetary policy. A higher federal funds rate and a shrinking Fed balance sheet shifted the buyer base from the Fed to money managers. Unlike the Fed, which is typically an uneconomic buyer, money managers are valuation-driven investors.
Additionally, uncertainty about the direction of interest rates heightened rate volatility. Borrowers can prepay mortgages at any time, and increased volatility raises the likelihood of prepayment, putting pressure on MBS spreads and causing them to widen. Thirty-year spreads are currently at 150 basis points (bps), down from their peak of 194 bps in May 2023 (Figure 1), but still far above their cycle lows of 60 bps in 2021.
Q: Is this the new level?
Brendan: No, MBS spreads will revert to longer term averages over time. Our view is that rate volatility will subside with further clarity on the Fed rate path, while Fed cuts will steepen the curve. This steepening is expected to boost demand from banks and mortgage real estate investment trusts (REITs), which had scaled back their activity in recent years due to the inverted yield curve. We saw these factors drive MBS spreads lower in the third quarter, while recent macro events — including a resilient job market and the US election — have increased rate volatility and driven spreads wider, creating an attractive opportunity.
Q: How are you positioned in the securitized sector?
Brendan: We are overweight MBS and asset-backed securities (ABS) as they are high-quality sectors trading at wide valuations to longer-term averages. We increased our allocation to the ABS sector in the first half of the year due to its low correlation with rate volatility and its shorter-duration maturities, which are expected to benefit from Fed rate cuts.
Within MBS, we are overweight in the middle to higher part of the coupon stack, which stands to benefit the most from lower rate volatility. We remain underweight lower coupon pools that continue to face headwinds from bank balance sheet restructuring activity.
Q: What has changed in the types of MBS pools you buy?
Brendan: The underlying collateral has changed. The higher rate environment pushed most MBS coupons on the stack to a discount. In fact, the average value of our holdings is 95 cents on the dollar, which has shifted our collateral preference. When buying MBS at a discount, we identify collateral prone to faster prepayment speeds as principal returned faster at par will increase total return. For instance, we prioritize collateral with higher exposure to mortgage brokers (instead of large banks), or states with higher turnover like Florida or Texas.
In premium coupon MBS, we favor pools with low loan balances that prepay slower when rates fall. Given the prepayment protection provided, these trade at a higher price than generic pools. This price increases relative to generic pools when interest rates fall. Figure 2 shows how the payup, or the amount investors pay above generic pools, went from around a half a point to four and a quarter points when the 10-year Treasury rallied by 200 basis points leading up to the pandemic. The duration of a portfolio with this type of collateral will lengthen relative to the Bloomberg US MBS Index into a rally and shorten into a selloff in rates, which is exactly what investors want.
Q: What is your outlook on the securitized sector?
Brendan: The securitized sector offers considerable value, and we anticipate it will outperform as we move past the short-term event-driven volatility. Within the MBS sector, spreads remain wide relative to historical averages, making them attractive compared to other high-quality sectors. The technical outlook has improved, with minimal net supply for conventional mortgages and increased bank demand following Fed bank capital proposals that proved less onerous than feared. Given this backdrop, we see MBS spreads as 40 bps wide of fair value and maintain a positive outlook on the sector, expecting mean-reversion in spreads (Figure 3).
We also favor ABS as a high-quality sector less correlated with rate volatility and Fed policy. ABS has lagged the spread tightening seen in other sectors, providing an attractive entry point. The sector’s duration is concentrated at the front end of the yield curve, which stands to benefit from Fed rate cuts and curve steepening.
Overall, we prefer spread product over Treasuries in the current carry environment. Although rates have retreated from recent highs, they remain appealing relative to post-GFC levels, and any significant weakness is likely to be capped by investors drawn to compelling absolute yields.
Brendan Doucette
Principal, Senior Securitized Analyst/Government Bond Portfolio ManagerDisclosures
This represents the views and opinions of GW&K Investment Management. It does not constitute investment advice or an offer or solicitation to purchase or sell any security and is subject to change at any time due to changes in market or economic conditions. The comments should not be construed as a recommendation of individual holdings or market sectors, but as an illustration of broader themes.
Investing in securities or investment strategies, including GW&K’s Investment Strategies presented in this document, involves risk of loss that clients should be prepared to bear. No investment process is free of risk; no strategy or risk management technique can guarantee returns or eliminate risk in any market environment. There is no guarantee that GW&K’s investment processes will be profitable, and you therefore may lose money. Past performance is no guarantee of future results. The value of investments, as well as any investment income, is not guaranteed and can fluctuate based on market conditions. Diversification does not assure a profit or protect against loss. GW&K’s active management styles include equity and fixed income strategies that are subject to various risks, including those described in GW&K’s Form ADV Part 2A may be found at the SEC’s website under Firm 121942, or is available from GW&K upon request.
Indexes are not subject to fees and expenses typically associated with managed accounts or investment funds. Investments cannot be made directly in an index. Index data has been obtained from third-party data providers that GW&K believes to be reliable, but GW&K does not guarantee its accuracy, completeness or timeliness.
Third-party data providers make no warranties or representations relating to the accuracy, completeness or timeliness of the data they provide and are not liable for any damages relating to this data. The third-party data may not be further redistributed or used without the relevant third-party’s consent. Sources for index data include: Bloomberg, FactSet, ICE, FTSE Russell, MSCI and Standard & Poor’s.